The report on the CPZ consultation has been published.
Overall, 52% of households responded to the survey with 65% saying they do not want a CPZ and only 36.8% saying they would want a CPZ on their road if everyone else wanted one. Most people didn’t care about the stopping up of the rear of 141-143 St Margarets Road (49.4) or about a car club (41.3).
NOTE: Click on the pie chart for details on each question.
The following roads have clearly voted ‘YES’:
| Bridge Road | 54% |
| Broadway Avenue | 89% |
| Kenley Road | 67% |
| Winchester Road | 73% |
| Orchard Road | 54% |
| St Peters Road | 70% |
| Cumberland Close | 55% |
The following roads have clearly voted ‘NO’:
| Ailsa Avenue | 82% |
| Ailsa Road | 83% |
| Cassilis Road | 83% |
| Cole Park Road | 72% |
| Gordon Avenue | 79% |
| Haliburton Road | 84% |
| Heathcote Road | 76% |
| Heron Road | 90% |
| Kilmorey Gardens | 81% |
| Kilmorey Road | 80% |
| Netherton Road | 82% |
| Newry Road | 94% |
| Nicol Close | 75% |
| Norfolk Close | 86% |
| Normanhurst Drive | 82% |
| Northcote Road | 89% |
| South Western Road | 82% |
| St Georges Road | 71% |
| St Margarets Drive | 76% |
| St Margarets Road | 74% |
| Talbot Road | 100% |
The remaining roads are somewhere in between ( see graph on right ).
Charleville Mews, Cole Park View, Cranebank Mews, Drummond Place and Sussex Close did not respond to the survey.
The report will be the main business of a meeting of the Transport Consultative Group on Wednesday, 18 July 2007, starting at 6:30 pm in the Council Chamber, York House, Twickenham. Contact: Helen Jones, Environment Directorate 020 8891 7338, Email: h.jones@richmond.gov.uk
thanks to Chris Squire for the core of this post
Comments
Peter, are there any results for Railshead Road? Gerhard
Gerhard Schellberg on 2007-07-13 22:23:06 +0000Gerhard,
UPDATED: I miss read the column!
Railshead Road had 26 surveys sent with only 4 people replying (a 15% response rate) all for the CPZ. 75% support joining the CPZ if everyone else gets one and 75% support a 'car club' scheme.
Look at tinyurl.com/2f4ww5,, Appendix B for the details.
Peter
Peter @ stmgrts.org.uk on 2007-07-14 09:42:47 +0000According to the Council's spreadsheet of replies they had none from Cole Park View(6 houses only). I know for a fact that 3 definitely replied and almost certainly 1 more."To lose one parent Mr Worthing might be regarded as a misfortune, to lose two looks like carelessness" - as to losing all our replies one can only draw one conclusion. Anyway the parking problem is solved. Cole Park Road has voted against so the whole Moormead area will ease up when they join the rest of our community.
Stephen Alexander on 2007-07-15 11:28:13 +0000It seems the council are going ahead with the next stage of the CPZ despite the results of the questionnaire - see below
www.richmond.gov.uk/home/view_member_decisions.htm?mgl=ieDecisionDetails.asp&ID=1251
Maeve Good on 2007-07-24 15:28:20 +0000Appendix B of the decision actually shows a 50% response rate from Cole Park View :)
Finlo on 2007-07-25 11:49:46 +0000I have asked this before but not received a reply. Why does Sidney Road not appear in the CPZ list. I certainly voted.
John on 2007-12-10 17:28:55 +0000John,
Look at the report itself or the bottom chart.
I did not list the roads that were in the middle as the list was too long. However Sydney was about 50 - 50...
Peter
Peter @ stmgrts.org.uk on 2007-12-10 18:31:25 +0000